Skip to content

Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre

  • Nursing Home

Updated Sep 1, 2022 by Nick Lata

Historical Rating
Grade: F
Jan 21: A-Feb 21: A-Mar 21: A-Apr 21: B+May 21: B+Jun 21: BJul 21: BAug 21: BSep 21: BOct 21: B-Nov 21: B-Jan 22: FFeb 22: FMar 22: FApr 22: CMay 22: CJun 22: CAug 22: DSep 22: F
See Rating Overview

1000 E Ave J,
Lampasas TX 76550

(512) 556-6267

44.34% estimated occupancy 1

Note: Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre has been flagged for abuse in the past 12 months. We have capped this facility's overall grade accordingly.

With an address in Lampasas, Texas, Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre is one of just three available nursing homes in the area. With an overall score of F, we consider this to be a lower end nursing home. Keep in mind that Lampasas received a city grade of B-, so should look at other options in the city as well. We wouldn't blame you if you are ready to stop reading and find another nursing home. However, if you want to learn more about this facility's category grades, we will discuss inspections in the next section.

Quick Details

  • Accepts Medicare 1
  • Accepts Medicaid 1
  • No CCRC
  • No Resident Council
  • Has Family Council
  • For profit - Limited Liability company

Registered Staff Hours

Medical Staff Hours Per Patient (2021)
April 1, 2021April 2, 2021April 3, 2021April 4, 2021April 5, 2021April 6, 2021April 7, 2021April 8, 2021April 9, 2021April 10, 2021April 11, 2021April 12, 2021April 13, 2021April 14, 2021April 15, 2021April 16, 2021April 17, 2021April 18, 2021April 19, 2021April 20, 2021April 21, 2021April 22, 2021April 23, 2021April 24, 2021April 25, 2021April 26, 2021April 27, 2021April 28, 2021April 29, 2021April 30, 2021
May 1, 2021May 2, 2021May 3, 2021May 4, 2021May 5, 2021May 6, 2021May 7, 2021May 8, 2021May 9, 2021May 10, 2021May 11, 2021May 12, 2021May 13, 2021May 14, 2021May 15, 2021May 16, 2021May 17, 2021May 18, 2021May 19, 2021May 20, 2021May 21, 2021May 22, 2021May 23, 2021May 24, 2021May 25, 2021May 26, 2021May 27, 2021May 28, 2021May 29, 2021May 30, 2021May 31, 2021
June 1, 2021June 2, 2021June 3, 2021June 4, 2021June 5, 2021June 6, 2021June 7, 2021June 8, 2021June 9, 2021June 10, 2021June 11, 2021June 12, 2021June 13, 2021June 14, 2021June 15, 2021June 16, 2021June 17, 2021June 18, 2021June 19, 2021June 20, 2021June 21, 2021June 22, 2021June 23, 2021June 24, 2021June 25, 2021June 26, 2021June 27, 2021June 28, 2021June 29, 2021June 30, 2021
July 1, 2021July 2, 2021July 3, 2021July 4, 2021July 5, 2021July 6, 2021July 7, 2021July 8, 2021July 9, 2021July 10, 2021July 11, 2021July 12, 2021July 13, 2021July 14, 2021July 15, 2021July 16, 2021July 17, 2021July 18, 2021July 19, 2021July 20, 2021July 21, 2021July 22, 2021July 23, 2021July 24, 2021July 25, 2021July 26, 2021July 27, 2021July 28, 2021July 29, 2021July 30, 2021July 31, 2021
August 1, 2021August 2, 2021August 3, 2021August 4, 2021August 5, 2021August 6, 2021August 7, 2021August 8, 2021August 9, 2021August 10, 2021August 11, 2021August 12, 2021August 13, 2021August 14, 2021August 15, 2021August 16, 2021August 17, 2021August 18, 2021August 19, 2021August 20, 2021August 21, 2021August 22, 2021August 23, 2021August 24, 2021August 25, 2021August 26, 2021August 27, 2021August 28, 2021August 29, 2021August 30, 2021August 31, 2021
September 1, 2021September 2, 2021September 3, 2021September 4, 2021September 5, 2021September 6, 2021September 7, 2021September 8, 2021September 9, 2021September 10, 2021September 11, 2021September 12, 2021September 13, 2021September 14, 2021September 15, 2021September 16, 2021September 17, 2021September 18, 2021September 19, 2021September 20, 2021September 21, 2021September 22, 2021September 23, 2021September 24, 2021September 25, 2021September 26, 2021September 27, 2021September 28, 2021September 29, 2021September 30, 2021

Facility Inspections

Grade: B-minus

While this facility's overall grade was as bad as it gets, it actually didn't perform terribly in the area of inspections. In fact, we awarded it a B- for that category, which is one of our better scores. We would argue that one of the most important factors in assessing an inspection report is deficiencies. In this regard, we especially focus on the severity of those deficiencies. Unfortunately, we weren't able to track down information on deficiency's for this nursing home. Lastly, this nursing home was cited by CMS for possible abuse or neglect. This is generally a really bad sign. We would never recommend this facility.

Short-term Care Quality

Grade: B-minus

Surprisingly, we awarded this nursing home a B- for our short-term care rating, which is not a bad grade. In our short-term care assessment, we endeavor to forge a fair gauge for rehabilitation services. In doing so, we assess the facility's offerings of skilled nursing services, including both registered nurses and physical therapy, as well as occupational therapy. We were surprised to find that this place was below average in the two key staffing areas we looked at. The facility provided fewer physical therapist and registered nurse hours per resident than most other nursing homes. It is important to determine whether this is adversely impacting the quality of care. The last statistic we considered in this area is the number of residents who who were able to eventually return home from the facility. We found that just 0 percent of this facility's patients returned home.

Nurse Quality

Grade: D

Turning to the area of nursing care, this facility received a grade of just D in this category. Our nursing rating includes numerous datapoints. The most heavily weighted variable is the amount of time nurses spent with patients. This particular nursing home averaged just 0.5 hours of nursing care per resident daily. This figure is well below the national average. Lastly, we also assessed some nursing quality-based metrics in computing our nursing grades. This nursing home performed well in terms of avoiding major falls and pressure ulcers. Many consider these statistics to be measures of the quality of nursing care.

Long-term Care Quality

Grade: D

The next area we analyzed was long-term care, which ended up being this nursing home's weakest category. We gave this facility a D in that area. When nursing homes receive this kind of grade in this category it is typically a bad sign for resident care and it may indicate that the facility is not as well-staffed. After assessing the quantity of care provided by nurses aids and other staff, we turned to the nursing home's vaccination data. Frankly, we were a bit bothered by the fact that this facility vaccinated 71.969696 percent of its patients for pneumonia, which is quite a few points lower than what we expected. Surprisingly, this nursing home was actually able to limit hospitalizations. With just 0.02 hospitalizations per one thousand long-term resident days, this nursing home had fewer hospitalizations than most nursing homes. This is its best feature in this category.

Rating Over Time

Compared to national and state averages across all facilities.

FDCB-BB+A-AA+Oct 18Sep 22

Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre Quality Metrics

Minimizes Pressure Ulcers

Grade: D

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 7.79% of Patients had Pressure Ulcers

This tells you the percent of residents who suffered from a pressure ulcer. Pressure ulcers are considered by many experts to be an indicator of the quality of nursing care . Pressure ulcers, which are also referred to as bed sores, are often caused by patients staying in one position for too long.

Minimizes Serious Falls

Grade: F

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 3.33% of Patients had Serious Falls

This figure is a measure of the percent of long-term residents that had falls leading to serious injury. We use this statistic in calculating our nursing ratings.

Minimizes Urinary Tract Infections

Grade: A+

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 1.51% of Patients had UTIs

This tells you the percentage of patients who suffered from a urinary tract infection. These infections could be associated with poorer hygiene.

Appropriately Uses Anti-Psychotic Medication

Grade: C

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 11.48% of Patients use Anti-Psychotic Medication

This statistic is an indication of the percentage of long-term patients who were given antipsychotic drugs. High levels of antipsychotic drug use may mean a facility is using these medications to control patient behavior in scenarios where such drugs are not medically required. Nevertheless, some nursing homes may need to rely more on these drugs due to an increased number of patients suffering from Alzheimer's or other dementias.

Appropriately Uses Anti-Anxiety Medication

Grade: F

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 22.56% of Patients use Anti-Anxiety Medication

This figure is an indication of the percent of long-term care residents that are administered antianxiety medication. These medications are generally given to patients experiencing anxiety or depression.

Managing Depression Among Residents

Grade: D

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 4.81% of Patients

This is the percent of residents exhibiting depressive symptoms.

Appropriate Vaccine Usage

Grade: D

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 94.64% of Patients

This indicates the percent of patients that were given the flu and pneumonia vaccines. High vaccination rates should be the norm at this point.

Residents Maintain Autonomy

Grade: D

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 17.1% Percentage of Patients

This is the percent of residents who needed more assistance with activities of daily living over time. High levels of needing for assistance with ADL's could be a sign of erosion of a patient's health.

Ability to Keep Residents Mobile

Grade: B-plus

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 16.36% Percentage of Residents

This is a measure of the percent of long-term stay patients that maintained mobility.


Grade: B-minus

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 1.67 Hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days

This datapoint is a measure of the number of hospitalizations per 1,000 days of patient care. Keeping residents out of the hospital is critical to the physical well-being of nursing home residents.

Short-term Care: Rehospitalizations

Grade: B-minus

In Cedar Hill Healthcare Centre, 16.36 Percentage of Residents Rehospitalized

This datapoint is a measure of the number of times residents are rehospitalized per 1,000 days of short-term patient care. Keeping residents out of the hospital during rehabilitation is critical to restoring the physical well-being of residents.