Rolling Hills Care Center
801 North 193 East Avenue, Catoosa OK 74015 · (918) 266-5500 · 68.49% estimated occupancy 1Updated: Aug 1, 2020 · By Sara Levinsohn
Rolling Hills Care Center is a large nursing home located in Catoosa, Oklahoma. With a really poor overall grade of F, this facility didn't fare well in our assessment. This place does not seem to have much going for it. We would not blame you if you are ready to stop reading and find another facility. However, if you want to learn more about this facility's category grades, inspection reports are discussed in the next paragraph.
Additional Details:
Accepts Medicare 1 :
Accepts Medicaid 1 : 126 Beds
CCRC :
For profit - Corporation
Resident Council:
Family Council:
Medical Staff Hours Per Patient (2019)
Facility Inspections
Although we gave this facility a terrible overall grade, we awarded it a B- for our inspections rating. In fact, the facility received very impressive inspection report this year. We take several aspects of a facility's inspection report into consideration in computing these inspection scores. One critical factor is health deficiencies. You should keep in mind that the severity of these deficiencies is usually more important than the number of deficiencies, as some end up being quite insignificant. While this nursing home had some minor dings on its inspection report, it had zero severe deficiencies. Severe deficiencies are ones labeled as categories G through L. This tells you that CMS did not consider any of the deficiencies on this facility's report to pose an imminent threat to patient health or safety. A few minor deficiencies are not the end of the world.
Long-term Care Quality
This nursing home also didn't fare too badly in the area of long-term care. Indeed, we awarded it a B- in that category, which happens to be among its more favorable scores. Long-term care grades assess a nursing home's assistance with daily living rather than the highly skilled therapy and healthcare services that are critical to a rehabilitation facility. After assessing the quantity of care provided by nurses and other staff, we then looked at the facility's vaccination data. This facility vaccinated 94.49838 percent of its residents against pneumonia, which is higher than the average nursing home. Finally, we looked at the facility's number of hospitalizations. Here we found that this facility had 2.18 hospitalizations per one thousand long-term resident days. Unfortunately, this figure was not quite as favorable than its other scores in the long-term care area.
Short-term Care Quality
Moving on to the area of short-term care, this nursing home was awarded a grade of just D in this category. Our short-term care grades are based in part on the nursing home's quantity of highly-skilled nursing services. This means a wide range of nursing services, spanning from registered nurses to physical and occupational therapists, not to mention other types of therapy. Based on its grade in this category, we weren't stunned to find that this place is well below average in terms of the number of registered nurse and physical therapy hours provided to its residents based on the measures we assessed. Frankly, this was about what we expected to find. The last area we looked at in this area is the number of patients who were able to return home from the facility. This place performed better in this area, with 53.6 percent of its residents returning home. This was just about this nursing home's only redeeming quality in this area.
Nurse Quality
The last category we analyzed is nursing. This nursing home received a poor grade of F in this area. The nursing category weighs quite a few factors, most of which are associated with nursing hours. This nursing home averaged only 2.9 hours of nursing care per resident each day. This is not a very impressive figure. In addition to receiving below average scores for total nursing hours, this place was less impressive in some of the quality-based measures we looked at in determining our nursing ratings. We looked at the percentage of patients sustaining pressure ulcers and found that this nursing home was at roughly 150 percent of the national average in this statistic. This is a bad sign when you consider that so many pressure ulcers are believed to be preventable with better nursing care. Unfortunately, this statistic really pulled down this nursing home's nursing rating substantially.
Overall Rating Over Time
Compared to national and state averages across all facilities.
Rolling Hills Care Center Quality Metrics
Minimizes Pressure Ulcers
This statistic tells you the percent of long-term care patients who are suffering from new or worsened pressure ulcers. We've found that pressure ulcers are a solid barometer of a facility's nursing care quality.
Percent of Patients with Pressure Ulcers
Lower is Better
Minimizes Serious Falls
This tells you the percent of patients that suffered from a major fall. Falls leading to major injury are considered by many in the nursing home industry to be an indicator of nursing care at a nursing home. Major falls are often the result of poor nursing care.
Percent of Patients with Serious Falls
Lower is Better
Minimizes Urinary Tract Infections
This figure measures the percent of long-term patients who experienced urinary tract infections. UTI's may be an indication of lower quality nursing care. However, this statistic could be skewed for certain nursing homes due to varying reporting standards for infections.
Percent of Patients with UTIs
Lower is Better
Appropriately Uses Anti-Psychotic Medication
This tells you the percent of residents prescribed antipsychotic medications. These drugs are sometimes used for a variety of conditions, such as Alzheimer's or other dementias.
Percent of Patients
Lower is Better
Appropriately Uses Anti-Anxiety Medication
This indicates the percent of residents given antianxiety drugs. Antianxiety medications are administered to patients experiencing depression and anxiety.
Percent of Patients
Lower is Better
Managing Depression Among Residents
This metric measures the percentage of long-term stay residents exhibiting symptoms of depression. Some experts argue that this is a reliable measure of resident quality of care.
Percent of Patients
Lower is Better
Appropriate Vaccine Usage
This metric is a measure of the percentage of long-term stay patients that were vaccinated against pneumonia and flu.
Percent of Patients
Higher is Better
Residents Maintain Autonomy
This is a measure of the percentage of long-term residents who required increased assistance with activities of daily living over time. Activities of daily living include activities such as taking medications and eating.
Percentage of Patients
Lower is Better
Ability to Keep Residents Mobile
This metric measures the percentage of long-term stay patients who remained mobile levels.
Percentage of Residents
Higher is Better
Hospitalizations
Measures the number of hospitalizations per thousand days of patient care. Avoiding the hospital is important to maintaining the physical health of nursing home residents.
Hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days
Lower is Better
Short-term Care: Rehospitalizations
This is the number of times residents are rehospitalized per 1,000 days of short-term care. There is typically a correlation between staying out of the hospital and a nursing home's quality of short-term rehabilitation.
Percentage of Residents Rehospitalized
Lower is Better
Short-term Care: ER Visits
This metric tracks the number of emergency room visits per thousand days of short-term patient care.
Percentage of Patients
Lower is Better
Short-term Care: Facilitates Functional Improvement
This tells you the percent of short-term stay residents that experienced functional improvements, such as enhanced ability to perform activities of daily living.
Percentage of Resident
Higher is Better