Canfield Healthcare Center

While this nursing home's overall grade was as bad as it gets, it actually didn't perform terribly in the area of inspections. In fact, we awarded it a B- for that category, which is one of our better scores. We take several aspects of a facility's inspection report into consideration in determining our inspection grades. One critical factor is deficiencies. You should keep in mind that the severity of these deficiencies is usually more meaningful than the number of deficiencies, as some of these can be relatively minor. Fortunately, although this facility had a few minor dings on its government inspection report, it had zero severe deficiencies. Severe deficiencies are found in categories G through L. This means the inspectors didn't consider any of the deficiencies on this facility's report to pose an imminent threat to patient health or safety. Finally, this facility was cited by CMS for possible abuse or neglect. We would not recommend this facility under any circumstance.

This nursing home also didn't perform too badly in the area of short-term care. In fact, we awarded it a C for that area, which is among its better scores. In computing our short-term care ratings, we look at a nursing home's levels of skilled nursing, which includes registered nurses, physical therapists respiratory therapists and other highly trained professionals. This area is more often than not a useful measure of the nursing home's ability to rehabilitate patients. We were surprised to find that this facility was below average in the two key staffing areas we assessed. The facility offered fewer physical therapist and registered nurse hours per resident than most other nursing homes. It is important to determine whether this also correlates to a lower quality of care. The final statistic we assessed in this area is the percentage of patients who returned home from the nursing home. We found that just 6 percent of this nursing home's residents returned home.

We also wanted to draw your attention to this facility's poor nursing grade where it received an F. Our nursing rating is based on a number of factors. The most heavily weighted one is the amount of time nurses spent with patients. This facility averaged a meager 0.3 hours of nursing care per resident daily. This is an alarmingly low total. Finally, we also looked at some nursing quality-based metrics in calculating our nursing scores. This place performed well when it comes to avoiding major falls and pressure ulcers.

The final area we analyzed was long-term care, where this facility was given an abysmal grade in this area also. We gave it an F for this category, which is definitely somewhat alarming. When facilities receive a score in this range in this category it typically means the nursing home didn't perform well in our quality measures relating to resident care. On top of looking at the quantity of care provided by nurses aids and other staff, we analyzed the number of residents vaccinated against pneumonia. This nursing home provided the vaccine to 91.50579 percent of its residents. This is a few points lower than we anticipated but still a decent percentage. To our surprise, this place was actually decent at keeping its residents out of the hospital. In fact, it had only 0 hospitalizations per 1,000 long-term resident days. This is its best score in this category.